I recently found at from n+1's article “Bad Education" that Good magazine’s education editor is sponsored by the for-profit institution University of Phoenix.  A bizarre relationship - which is undoubtedly reflected in Good's education content (and not just the fact that the education page is littered with ads from UP).  
Take for example this info graphic which is sponsored by UP.  It “objectively” asks which model of higher education is more sustainable.  The graphic ostensibly presents plain facts but fails to point out the vast differences between non-profits and for-profits graduation rates (for example, UP averages about an eighteen percent graduation rate).  Nor does the graphic take into account the fact that students at for-profit institutions leave with two-to-three times the student debt as their non-profit counterparts.  
Lastly, there isn’t a single story in Good's education section about the shady practices of for-profit universities. A cursory glance at the front page of, say, The Chronicle of Higher Education has numerous stories about the exploitative practices of for-profit universities.  
Maybe I’m being overly-critical but it seems to me that Good has a serious problem which fundamentally undermines its mission as a source for “conscious consumers.” Image via Good. 

I recently found at from n+1's article “Bad Education" that Good magazine’s education editor is sponsored by the for-profit institution University of Phoenix.  A bizarre relationship - which is undoubtedly reflected in Good's education content (and not just the fact that the education page is littered with ads from UP).  


Take for example this info graphic which is sponsored by UP.  It “objectively” asks which model of higher education is more sustainable.  The graphic ostensibly presents plain facts but fails to point out the vast differences between non-profits and for-profits graduation rates (for example, UP averages about an eighteen percent graduation rate).  Nor does the graphic take into account the fact that students at for-profit institutions leave with two-to-three times the student debt as their non-profit counterparts.  


Lastly, there isn’t a single story in Good's education section about the shady practices of for-profit universities. A cursory glance at the front page of, say, The Chronicle of Higher Education has numerous stories about the exploitative practices of for-profit universities.  


Maybe I’m being overly-critical but it seems to me that Good has a serious problem which fundamentally undermines its mission as a source for “conscious consumers.” 
Image via Good

  1. wsdycom reblogged this from motherjones
  2. vomfuerst reblogged this from motherjones
  3. big-foot-research reblogged this from motherjones
  4. wunillinios reblogged this from motherjones
  5. umakarubi reblogged this from motherjones
  6. windycity-storage reblogged this from motherjones
  7. slembassyisrael1 reblogged this from motherjones
  8. r-scott-reid reblogged this from motherjones
  9. taxi-sacramento reblogged this from motherjones
  10. facebook-social-media-marketing reblogged this from motherjones
  11. top-fantasy-books reblogged this from motherjones
  12. personal-trainer-los-angeles reblogged this from motherjones
  13. chris-carpenter reblogged this from motherjones
  14. truck-accessories reblogged this from motherjones
  15. brand-name-clothing reblogged this from motherjones
  16. the-edene reblogged this from motherjones
  17. used-bmw reblogged this from motherjones
  18. tjana-pengar reblogged this from motherjones
  19. bangla-song reblogged this from motherjones
  20. qr--codes reblogged this from motherjones
  21. curator-of-curiosities posted this